Thursday, July 30, 2009

Thought So...

Well as I mentioned below Rachelle Leferve is going to be replaced by Bryce Dallas Howard for the 3rd installment of the Twilight Saga (hehe that name still makes me laugh). I was really wondering why on Earth would she chose to do some random movie instead of being apart of a huge Blockbuster movie like Twilight? Turns out she might not have made the decision.

Here is her response...

“I was fully committed to the ‘Twilight’ saga, and to the portrayal of Victoria. I turned down several other film opportunities and, in accordance with my contractual rights, accepted only roles that would involve very short shooting schedules. My commitment to ‘Barney’s Version’ is only ten days. Summit picked up my option for ‘Eclipse.’ Although the production schedule for ‘Eclipse’ is over three months long, Summit said they had a conflict during those ten days and would not accommodate me. Given the length of filming for ‘Eclipse,’ never did I fathom I would lose the role over a 10 day overlap. I was happy with my contract with Summit and was fully prepared to continue to honor it. Summit chose simply to recast the part. I am greatly saddened that I will not get to complete my portrayal of Victoria for the ‘Twilight’ audience. This is a story, a theatrical journey and a character that I truly love and about which I am very passionate. I will be forever grateful to the fan support and loyalty I’ve received since being cast for this role, and I am hurt deeply by Summit’s surprising decision to move on without me. I wish the cast and crew of ‘Eclipse’ only the very best."

Lameson! If that is really how it went down that completely sucks for her. It's also really stupid for them to change up the character for the THIRD movie! I think it'll make it awkward and even if Bryce can pull off the angry vampire look it'll still be a stretch.

In other recasting news. Here is a short clip of Kristen Stewart and Taylor Lautner at Comic-Con. UGH my hate for Kristen really runs deep at this point but the fact that the girl couldn't even be bothered to wash herself before going urks me. It's so obvious that she could care less about this character and a movie which is going to make her known for many years to come.

Be grateful bitch you need a bath and a hug asap!



10 comments:

  1. lol! she is not my fav either, but she was a pretty good Bella, I must admit...

    that does suck for her, I thought she was a perfect victoria!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. ohh I'm sad for her :( she sounds really upset. that's so lame they would switch up the character for the 3rd movie. :(:((:(

    ReplyDelete
  3. That really sucks for her...you can tell she is super bummed and sad, I would be too!

    If I see your little puppy anywhere on the internet I will FREAK OUT and let you know! :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Someone needs to bring out the "lightness" in Kristen!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you for all the Twilight updates!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I just read about that on people.com! Poor Rachelle, I would be pissed. As for Kristen she needs to wash her mop and get a new 'tude!

    ReplyDelete
  7. kristin BLOWS. she seriously needs to realize how lucky she is that everyone knows her name, and some people actually like her.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Am I the only one who hated Rachelle in Twilight? I dunno, maybe cos she wasn't what I had pictured in my head at all, I didn't rate her!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Pretty blog! I LOVE Rachel L....she's gorgeous, her hair is to-die-for...I can't imagine why they would replace such a bombshell!

    ReplyDelete

People who are pink & fabulous...